Wednesday, 4 December 2013

A2 LL - COURSEWORK GUIDE

A2 ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE

ELLA 4:  Comparative Analysis through Independent Study
THE COURSEWORK GUIDE

The requirements for the coursework:

·         You must compare TWO writers in your coursework essay.

·         ONE of these writers MUST be a poet.

·         You may choose to compare two different poets OR compare one poet’s writing with a prose fiction text (novel or short story) OR a play.  When discussing a poet’s writing you should aim to consider about 2 / 3 poems per poet; with prose fiction or a play aim to consider about 2 / 3 key extracts. (NB the aim is to write a close analytical comparison; you must write a lot about a little!)

·         You must write a minimum of 2000 and a maximum of 2500 words.

·         You must submit a FIRST DRAFT to your teacher who will then offer guidance and advice about how to develop and improve your essay on a 1 to 1 basis.  This will include annotations to your essay and a discussion.

·         You must then work independently on your FINAL DRAFT.  You may discuss an aspect of the texts you are comparing or an aspect of your essay with your teacher but there must be no further written feedback or advice.

·         Your final draft must be submitted with: 

1.      the essay with a signed coversheet

2.      the first draft with your teacher’s notes /advice

3.      copies of the texts discussed in the essay (this can be your annotated copies of poems) including photocopies of key extracts from fiction or play texts.

DEADLINES
DATE
Coursework essay title decided
w.b. 9 December 2013
Completed detailed essay plan, thesis, start drafting
w.b. 16 December 2013
Christmas Break
First draft essay deadline
by Fri 10  Jan 2014
First drafts returned and 1 to 1 appointments from
Between 17  – 24  Jan 2014
Coursework deadline
Thursday 13 February 2014

 
·         You MUST meet the deadline for the final draft. Late submissions will not be accepted without a medical certificate of illness or other exceptional circumstances notified by your parent / guardian.

·         PLAGIARISM: you must not copy anything from critical essays or study guides you may have read about your chosen writers. You sign a declaration that the essay is all your own work.  Coursework marks are cancelled if plagiarism is found by AQA.  If plagiarism is found in your essay before it is sent to AQA (by your own teacher or by others in the English team during moderation) you will have to rewrite your coursework essay in examination conditions with the English Section Manager; you will only have access to the texts and handwritten notes made in lessons.

 The ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES FOR ELLA 4 COURSEWORK

AO1     select and apply relevant concepts and approaches from integrated linguistic study using appropriate terminology and accurate written expression.  (you need to be able to use appropriate specialist concepts and literary and linguistic terminology to write about literary texts AND write clearly, precisely and accurately.)                                                                                                  30 marks
AO3     use integrated approaches to explore relationships between texts, analysing and evaluating the significance of contextual factors in their production and reception.  (you need to evaluate and interpret texts using your linguistic and literary understanding AND compare texts - which might include some relevant social / cultural / historical contexts).                                                                                                                                            30 marks

Advice for successful coursework:

Title:  make sure that the title you decide on (with guidance from your teacher) begins with the words:  “Compare the ways in which …. “ and does not have too broad a focus for comparison.  A good title has a clear/ sharp focus for comparison:          

 e.g. “Compare the ways in which Heaney and Friel depict conflict in relationships in ‘Selected Poems’ and ‘Translations’.” 
 OR                                                                                                                                                                
 “Compare the ways in which Larkin and Blake portray urban and rural environments in their poetry.”

Introduction and Thesis:    You should name and introduce the key writers you will be analysing. Make sure you establish a clear and interesting thesis in the opening paragraph.  A ‘thesis’ here means a proposition (or key idea which links your chosen texts) which you intend to prove through your argument.  This will expand upon and explain the title.  You need to sustain a logical investigation of that thesis throughout the essay i.e. refer back to your title and thesis to build up your argument.

e.g. Both William Blake and Philip Larkin offer portrayals of both urban and rural life in their collections of poetry ‘Songs of Innocence and Experience’ and ‘The Whitsun Weddings’. Blake presents the clarity and continuity of rural lives as opposed to  Larkin’s view of the complexity of life and the powerlessness of individuals within large cities such as London or Hull.

Relevance:    Firstly, make sure the key theme of your thesis is properly illustrated by the texts you have chosen.  Then make sure to select a range of apt quotations to illustrate the points you wish to make to build your argument and support your original thesis. This will show clearly in your paragraph plan, which will show a series of key topics and the key evidence you will discuss

e.g.  (just 2 paragraphs here – you will need several!)

Key point
Evidence to analyse and discuss
Blake values dignity/ beauty of rural life   similar to
Larkin sees nature offering inspiration /. Freedom / tranquillity
The Echoing Green: “the sun does arise etc  ......’  -  innocence / happiness.  “green”  “skylark” etc -
Here: “unfenced, out of reach” ...  no restrictions / endless space
Blake – London as crowded and haunted contrasts with his Echoing Green
City – “sigh” and “curse”
E. Green “laugh away care”

 Comparison:  you need to sustain a balanced comparison of the methods of the two writers and relate that clearly to the theme chosen. This means that you compare the texts throughout the essay – don’t write about them separately or one-by-one.                                                                                                         Sometimes it will be straightforward to link / compare an aspect of two texts in one paragraph.  At other times you may need to devote a whole paragraph or even two paragraphs to make some well-developed analytical points about one writer’s choice and use of language and their effects.  But you must regularly make comparative links between the texts you have chosen.

e.g. a paragraph which compares 2 writers:

Blake valued rural life and often writes of its dignity, as in the second poem from ‘Songs of Innocence and Experience’, ‘Echoing Green’.  He portrays the idea of innocence reflected in nature within the village with ‘The sun doth rise, And make happy the skies’ carrying strong connotations of life, happiness and prosperity.  Blake, as in many other works, adopts a simple style of writing in order to reflect his ideology that simple village life holds importance.  The poem continues to evoke the innocence of the natural environment through his diction such as ‘green’, ‘skylark’ and ‘bush’.  The image of villages welcoming ‘the spring’ transfers the season’s connotations of growth, life and rebirth to the villages themselves and sound imagery links the celebratory atmosphere and liveliness of the village: ‘Bells sing louder’ and ‘cheerful sound’ with the mood of nature.  Larkin presents a similar idea of nature offering inspiration and a chance to listen to your own voice in “Here” through his description of outer coastal areas. “Here is unfenced existence: Facing the sun, untalkative, out of reach.’ Larkin, unlike Blake, emphasises silence as accompanying freedom and tranquillity in nature. Larkin’s use of diction in ‘unfenced’ and ‘out of reach’ carry strong connotations of no restrictions and endless space which is mirrored in rural environments.

e.g. a paragraph which focuses on 1 writer:

Blake’s “London” employs natural imagery but portrays the city as crowded and haunted by using sound imagery such as ‘cry’, ‘sigh’ and ‘curse’ all of which suggest suffering.  However, there is no such suffering in “The Echoing Green” where ‘Old John with white hair, Does laugh way care, Sitting under the oak’. The symbolism of age and kinship in the oak and the white head convey dignity. John is retired and yet still part of the community.  Blake presents village as places of natural growth ‘Such were the joys / When we all, girls and boys / In our youth time were seen / On the echoing green” portrays children growing up, leading that same rural life and finally sitting ‘under the oak’ watching the next generation themselves.  This reinforces a sense of unchanging community through the generations, resisting the pressures of the ever changing materialistic city of ‘London’.  Blake’s repeated epithet of “On the Echoing Green” emphasises the importance of the ‘green’ to the community and its colour as a symbol of growth and life.

Use of Frameworks:  select from a range of literary and linguistic terms in order to analyse the texts and demonstrate how the writers have created their effects. (see above examples). YOU HAVE BEEN DOING THIS DURING YOUR CLASS STUDY OF ALL THE TEXTS!   It is important to plan to use a good range of analytical ‘tools’ – from exploring the ‘word’ level of the texts to the use of metaphor / symbolism. BUT do not treat this as a list to be ‘ticked off’. Every point made about linguistic / literary devices MUST BE DEVELOPED BY A DISCUSSION OF THE EFFECT  - IMAGES AND IDEAS CREATED.

Context:  you need to contextualise the material chosen intelligently. Contextual comment should have a direct bearing on the argument of the essay where the context has an important influence on the language choice of the writer.  You must avoid unnecessary biographical detail about the writers which adds little to show your understanding / analytical skill.