Thursday, 23 February 2012

A2 ENGLISH LITERATURE - AN INTRODUCTION EXAMPLE AND COMMENT


I’m going to use the three poems on horses that I’ve already used to show how to plan and write an analytical comparative paragraph. It may be worth reading the poems again quickly just to get an idea of how they can be used.  You can read the poems here.

Remember that this example uses only one genre – poetry so bare this in mind.
So imagine I’m writing an essay under the title 

‘Horses embody an elemental force of nature in the English Literary tradition’. To what extent do you agree with this statement with reference to Hughes’s The Horses, MacNeice’s The Horses and Muir’s Horses.

FEATURES
TEXT
Firstly respond directly to the key words in the essay title - such as 'outsiders', 'bleak view of the human condition', 'love' and 'suffering'. These will be broad and abstract concepts. Try and define these concepts using your own words. Why not use a dictionary and a thesaurus to help you do this. What do you think they mean?
Horses are traditionally seen in literature as powerful elemental forces, life- long companions in the service to humans and objects of love and emotions.  Hughes’s The Horses, MacNeice’s The Horses and Muir’s Horses all present elements of these conventional views of horses but bring a fresh and dynamic perspective.
Then show how these concepts can be applied to the three texts. In general what does text a, b and c say about the key theme. This will involve you naming each text and the writer as well as a brief summary of the text - no more than a sentence. What do your writers say specifically about these concepts?
Then go on to make general comparative and or contrasting points with the texts.  I expect there will be similarities and differences between the three texts.   You may find especially with Betjeman differences between poems. Although Larkin's poetry has a consistent and sustained vision of the world.
Despite the static portrait of the horses in Hughes's presentation in his free verse poem, Hughes presents the horses as raw, elemental, of the earth and quite indifferent the the human world. In contrast MacNeice's poem presents them totally dominated by human society. Where the relationship between horses and humans is one of master and servant or slave. Muir however combines both the natural and wild elements of the horses along with their desire for companionship and service to people. 
Follow this up by identifying briefly broad contextual features of their writing. Avoid writing specific biographical facts about the life of [Larkin] or [Betjeman], Hartley and Miller.
These different presentations of horses are in part influenced by the different cultural contexts of each poet. For example MacNeice wrote his poem during the decade of the depression of the 1930's. In it he offers his target audience of children a comforting and highly structured vision of a society full of human order and control. And yet in the circus setting he offers a brief escape from the difficulties of life. On the other hand Hughes - writing in the late 1950's writes a poem celebrating the natural world and the force of nature. Hughes was a conservationist. Writing at a time of urban expansion he reminds the public of the value of the countryside and the beauty of nature. Muir's poem was written during the cold war. In it he imagines the results and the effects on human communities after a world war.
Also make a comment about how each of the three writers and their work have been received by society or specific critics either at the time they were written or in the present time.
Hughes's poetry has been described as being 'plugged in to the very soul of England'. Whereas Muir has been described as 'observing Europe's political and cultural landscape'. And MacNeice offers 'close detailed social observations.'
Finally you should identify some of the important  literary features from each of the texts. You should focus on the dominant literary features and make comparative and or contrasting points. You can make specific references to the different genres here. Perhaps emphasise the dramatic conflict of the drama, the poetic techniques of the poetry like rhyme and rhythm and the first person narrator of the prose text.
MacNeice's strong use of rhythm and rhyme helps emphasise a regular and ordered society. Hughes elemental and sensory language helps create a strong evocation of the wild countryside. Finally Muir's poem is embedded in fable and story-telling. This is emphasised by the dramatic monologue and narrative style of the poem.